My Appeal to Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan, Leaders of the Two Most Holy Hearts Mission
My Appeal to Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan, Leaders of the Two Most Holy Hearts Mission
Felipe Perez Marti
October 29, 2025
1. Introduction
Dear Mélanie, Daniel, Stephan, and most of the people in the groups I used to coordinate within the mission of the Two Most Holy Hearts—in particular, those who have been exposed to their version of my behavior, which led them to cut ties with me in the mission. Also, to Xavier Ayral, the main voice for Fr. Michel Rodrigue and Luz de María de Bonilla in English and French. I copy him since the names of these prophets have been affected by this situation. All of you are part of this de facto “community,” as defined below by Jesus (Matthew 18:15-17). I write this to you because I think Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan (from now on Mélanie and her team) acted so wrongly in this situation that you deserve to know about it, if you want to continue to believe in the mission. What is even worse: there are key aspects of Melanie’s messages that contradict the principles of our catholic Church, according to my opinion, as we will see. But it can be corrected, which is what I propose here.
The two basic points for the decision: one, that I said in an article signed by me, that President Trump, by supporting Benjamin Netanyahu, is partially responsible for the genocide in Gaza. I said that in the context of an email in which I transmitted Mélanie’s message from heaven to pray and fast for the president of the United States. Melanie said that according to a message from Jesus to her, my email had the consequence of producing a suicide among the people who read it.
The second point is that I said that other Marian prophets had also recommended something similar to what Mélanie is recommending now due to a message from heaven: to have enough cash at home in order to be able to buy goods when banking services, including the use of credit cards, are not going to be available. The problem with this second point, according to Mélanie and her team, is that I should not mix her messages with those of other prophets, as explained below.
You can see the message that caused the problem, which I sent to the Era of Peace email group, and also the corrections Mélanie asked me to do, in this thread: https://groups.google.com/g/sharing-era-of-peace/c/qxzyAzpb2Sc
In this document, I present to you the kind of reasoning I made to Mélanie and her team on the mentioned two points. As you will see, I explain that the arguments behind the decision to cut ties with me are wrong. The situation has led me to reflect on my previous beliefs about the messages from Mélanie. After careful and long considerations, which I summarize here, I have come to believe that some of the important messages Mélanie receives do not come from heaven. I have asked Mélanie to correct that, in order not to hurt the mission of the Two Hearts. But she has not done so to my knowledge. And all of you should know this, since I don’t want to be hurt down the road because of this.
If fundamental issues are not corrected, the whole catholic church would be hurt, and we should alert the authorities to avoid the respective harm. In fact, some problems I have found are so serious that they call into question whether the mission Mélanie is leading is from God or from the devil. In particular, they produce division, not only among us, but with the main prophets of our time, Fr. Michel Rodrigue and Luz de María de Bonilla. The divisions with those prophets are based on fallacious arguments, on the one hand, that contradict public revelation (the Bible) and official Church doctrine (the Catechism), on the other. Jesus told us that a tree must be judged by its fruits, and the book of Revelations says that in apocalyptic times one cannot be tepid: one has to choose sides. I use this in my arguments below.
I personally believe that many of Mélanie’s messages are genuine, such as those related to the chaplets and prayers of consecration. But her failure to correct errors, after more than a month given to them (the first incident happened on September 18th), can tarnish the entire mission, including the messages that heaven wants to reach us. If there is no trust in the people, the doubts would kill the mission, in particular if the Vatican observes the contradictions to the Bible and to the Catechism that I present below. We don’t want that to happen and we can make corrections, if we act on time.
This message to all of you is based on Jesus' direct teaching for these cases:
Matthew 18:15-17 (New Jerusalem Bible): If your brother does something wrong, go and have it out with him alone, between your two selves. If he listens to you, you have won back your brother. If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you: whatever the misdemeanor, the evidence of two or three witnesses is required to sustain the charge. But if he refuses to listen to these, report it to the community; and if he refuses to listen to the community, treat him like a gentile or a tax collector. With this, I am in the second stage, with more than a witness, since most of you have been exposed to the problem already, without my version about it.
2. The presumed suicide of a person in the Sharing Era of Peace email group.
I said in my email:
“Today I spoke with Mélanie and her team.
“First of all, heaven—especially the one related to Charlie Kirk and Andrew Jackson, which I mentioned to you before—is asking us to pray and fast for Donald Trump, the President of the United States. Especially tomorrow, Friday. A strong fast for tomorrow. But it's good to also extend the fast, which can be lighter (skipping one meal, for example) both on Saturday and Sunday. The reason is that he is surrounded by evil, satanic forces that have him partially captured. It is true that, after a time, he would be freed. But our spiritual action is very important so that the good side triumphs more quickly.”
Continuing with the topic, I had said a couple of phrases about what is happening here:
“The Trump government has unfortunately been infiltrated by the Deep State. We have warned him that his 2025 victory does not guarantee the defeat of that international criminal structure. What happened with the Jeffrey Epstein case shows it clearly. The MOSSAD and the CIA, key instruments of satanic Zionism, which in turn dominates—beyond appearances—the Deep State, have been capturing American politicians for a long time. There are already solid bases that have used that country for their own purposes of territorial, spiritual, and political expansion. Those who have opposed it have paid with their lives, like John F. Kennedy, or their careers, like Richard Nixon. It has used it, with false flags, to advance its interests and wars in the Middle East, like the case of the collapse of the Twin Towers in New York. And several high-profile cases and many not so high-profile ones more. Conspiracy theory? The evidence is overwhelming, once X was freed for the exchange of ideas among citizens, victims of the rent-seeking elites of the whole world.
“Supporting Netanyahu in the Gaza war, with its atrocious genocide, is a shame for his electoral promises and makes Donald Trump complicit in that genocide perhaps never before seen in history, due to its characteristics regarding children, the sick, and the helpless of the civilian population, in addition to the massacres of journalists and Christians. Many people who supported him are strongly questioning him for that.”
My comment about President Trump, which quotes an article originally directed to Venezuelans, concludes with the positive part:
“Even the Antichrist himself, whether he dominates Trump or not, will not rule Venezuela. At least not for a long time. He is going to be defeated. God does not want other devils ruling Venezuela. To see it clearly, let's talk about the spiritual topic. Before that, it's good to know that people from Mélanie Dupuis's close team, who know very well her prophecies in general and those of the United States in particular, have told me that their conclusion is that Donald Trump, in the end, by heavenly protection (with Andrew Jackson at the forefront), is going to break free from the Deep State infiltration and is going to do things as God commands. I think that's how it will be, because I also trust them a lot and their knowledge on the prophetic topic related to Mélanie Dupuis.”
After Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan read the email (I made a hidden copy to them), they told me to immediately modify it, according to the indications they made. I did it, as it can be seen in the thread. But they wanted immediate action, and I did not respond with the speed they required, since I felt I needed some time to reflect on the matter, given that I felt confident of their implicit approval when I sent the email. The reason for their urgency to proceed fast with the modifications, as they explained, was that, because of the statements on President Trump, a person who read the email committed suicide. Jesus told Mélanie so, according to her. They did not want more suicides because of my message.
A thing to notice here is that Mélanie demanded not only that immediate obedience. She insisted in private on blind obedience. But I told Mélanie, in private, that even the most rigorous Catholic monasteries do not require blind obedience. I quoted authoritative voices on the matter:
“The Catholic Church, in its doctrine, rejects blind faith in a human superior. My impression is that when the incident occurred, you were asking me for that and for me to act immediately, which didn't seem right to me. Blind faith and obedience based on that faith are not required even in the strictest religious communities. For example, Saint Thomas Aquinas tells us that 'Obedience is not blind; it must be according to reason, not against God.' If a superior commands something contrary to faith or morals, it must be disobeyed, since 'we must obey God rather than men' (Acts 5:29). The phrase 'according to reason' is key. Also, 'not against God' (as in the case of Gaza, which even Pope Leo has condemned).
“In the case of Saint Teresa of Avila (in her work 'The Way of Perfection'), she warns against blind obedience; it must be illuminated by prayer and discernment. Finally, the Second Vatican Council (Perfectae Caritatis, 14) emphasizes that religious obedience must be 'intelligent and responsible,' not mechanical.”
Even though I did the corrections to the email that Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan gave me, I argued in private that I doubted the suicide statement. The reasons are that, first of all, before all this, I had shared directly with the team by WhatsApp, several times, about the content of the article which contained this text about Trump. That is why, when I sent the email, I was confident there would not be any problem with it. And that is why I did not ask them in advance. Sometimes I have proceeded this way, when I am sure they would approve it. Especially when we are in a hurry, as in this case, since the prayers and fasting had to be done that day.
As it turns out, they had not read the first part of the article. I presented them the link, but showed them only the paragraph in which I mentioned Stephan, the one that needed direct revision. Even if they might be blamed, we can be forgiving and say that Mélanie and her team would not be to blame for the suicide, in case it really happened. But Jesus would be to blame, which is impossible, of course. Why? Because Jesus knew the content of the whole article.
To clarify again, for this is important: even though I sent them the link to the whole article, I did not show them the two paragraphs, only the positive one about Trump (the reason is because I wanted to talk about the “team,” not to single out Stephan, who was the one who told me that Trump was in control).
I did not know, then, that they did not read the whole article. In particular, I thought they did, since Stephan said then, a week before, in the chat the four of us used to share:
“[9/5, 5:07 PM] Stephan Renaud: “Hey my friend Felipe, I apologize for not answering your message earlier today. It’s really been a very busy day…. Everything’s OK with your article, no problem with me! Have a great evening, see you tomorrow! 🙏😇🙏”
That shows why I was pretty confident about sending that content. It is obvious, again, that Stephan did not read the whole thing, judging by their reaction later. I have all the receipts on this matter, and can send them to you if needed.
But my point is that Jesus read the article. He knows everything, as we know. Wouldn’t Jesus ask Stephan to read the whole article before he stated “Everything’s OK with your article, no problem with me!”? A life would have been spared. So, we can certainly blame Jesus for that death, which is absurd. This proves, without a doubt, that the presumed message from Jesus to Mélanie did not come from Him. A direct corollary is that it does not make sense that someone committed suicide because of my email, because Jesus was involved and would have avoided it. On top of that, the group “Sharing Era of Peace” is used to my arguments on this topic of Trump: I have supported him for a long time, but have expressed concerns about his last deviations, commented here.
3. Whether Trump, or God, is in control
Mélanie’s correcting statements about Trump include:
"There are people who amuse themselves by slipping in a bad scenario about Trump, even though he is in control of the situation.”
“The fasting and prayers are to stop this false narrative that troubles souls of good will.”
Also, to my statement “The Trump government has unfortunately been infiltrated by the Deep State.” Mélanie corrected it this way:
“Yes, the government was infiltrated for many years by the Deep State long before he was elected.”
I showed them that the Deep State is still in control, even after the election: most of Congress is compromised, most of the judiciary, and regional and local governments. Trump does not control those instances of government. Furthermore: he seems to be controlled, as shown by his actions, by a foreign government, that of Israel: among other things, he has clearly approved of the annexation not only of Gaza, but of the whole West Bank, since Netanyahu said so after the peace agreement; and his son in law, Jared Kushner, husband of Ivanka, is to play a key role in financing and reconstructing of Gaza.
I insisted that we should say that “God is in control,” not “Trump is in control.” They did not want to change this and said they disagreed with me, and so I began to doubt also that the respective messages to Mélanie came from heaven.
I myself have supported Trump, even from before, and wish he is successful in the end, correcting the apparent course. But the corrections to my email by Mélanie are really contrary to the Catholic Church teaching, on the one hand, and to reality, on the other, in my opinion.
First of all, even a saint is not canonized but after his or her death. The reason is that every person has free will. And he or she can deviate from the will of God. God uses people for His plan. Especially saintly ones. And also people in key positions. But His providential plan does not depend on them. God’s power is overwhelming, and has a good plan for humanity (CCC 203, 212, 213). But to say that a given person is in control, in order to implement God’s providence, looks like idolatry to me, from CCC 203, 204, 213. For example, in CCC 230, God's "absolute sovereignty over the course of events," means that no human (even a leader like Trump) truly "controls" history or outcomes—God does. Saying a person is "in control" implicitly denies this, since it implies that human performance is above divine providence. On the other hand, scripture examples (e.g., Proverbs 21:1: "The king's heart is a stream of water in the hand of the Lord; he turns it wherever he will") show leaders are directed by God, not autonomous, even when they have a mission from God.
But not only that: it is unnecessary, too. God knows about politics (He is the creator of the natural and social laws, as well as the laws of the spiritual realm). Why exclude people who have a rejection of Trump, or people who have doubts about Trump?
In this regard, it is a fact that God inspired directly, through His Church, the foundation of democracy as we know it (contrary to the teachings of the false Enlightenment, led by Masonry). It was not in Greece, or in Rome that democracy came about. It was in the Middle Ages, in the Benedictine monasteries, in which those principles were initiated:
1. All people are equal before God, since all are children of His, so that they should be equal in the law in order to elect officials and leaders.
2. Government officials must represent the interests of the people.
3. Freedom of expression is crucial for that, since there is asymmetric information (the officials know more about their plans and intentions, and about what happens during the implementations of their plans, than the people).
This is formalized in the so-called “Principal-Agent” theory: Government officials are agents of the people, which is the principal. As a consequence, in particular regarding that asymmetric information, the agents are not “innocent until proven guilty.” In fact, they should be considered guilty unless they demonstrate the contrary: they have the burden of proof, not the people. The way they do it is by their performance, their observable signals. This is important in our current times, when the Deep State pretends to eliminate freedom of expression by imposing the false principle that even politicians are innocent until proven guilty. That is completely wrong and goes in favor of the devil, against the foundations of true democracy.
So, if some people don’t believe in Trump, we cannot blame them for that. Even if they are wrong. So, to say that "There are people who amuse themselves by slipping in a bad scenario about Trump, even though he is in control of the situation.”
And “The fasting and prayers are to stop this false narrative that troubles souls of good will.”
Seems to me to be contrary to the basic principles of democracy, founded by God through His providence (CCC 302-307; 312).
For example, right now many Republicans (and Democrats) are criticizing Trump in a rightful way, regarding the Epstein files and the FBI and DOJ handling of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. The main leaders questioning the official narrative are Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson. But there is a whole army of independent citizens documenting the evidence and formulating the doubts of the official narrative, rightly so, since they expose the truth on these matters, while the devil is trying to hide it. And they have detected clearly that Israel is involved in the assassination. As the theory of democracy states: Israel is guilty unless it demonstrates innocence; it has the burden or proof. And actions (trying to control public opinion) points exactly to the contrary.
In these two cases, it is clear that the Israeli government is implied as well as in the control of the US government. Most of the US Congress is in control of the Israel state, by using campaign contributions (mainly through AIPAC) and/or sexual compromise. It is good to mention the Epstein files and honeytrap operations, for blackmail. Again, I, and nobody else, needs no proof to believe and say this, by the way: they are guilty until proven innocent, judging by the evidence that has come out regarding this. And they have not done so, on the contrary: they have acted shamelessly to persecute those who have shown the truth, and have used the media and social networks to penalize with defamation and discrediting campaigns those who have asked questions and have shown evidence that contradicts the official version. Now they have reached X, which was a notable safe haven of freedom of expression until now, thanks to Elon Musk (Netanyahu said in public that he would talk to him, since “he is a friend, not an enemy”).
In fact, we have to realize that we are in Apocalyptic times, in order to properly judge these things. And that the Antichrist is Jewish, by definition (he is the “true messiah,” descendant of King David, not Jesus, according to the same kind of Jewish people, today, who killed Jesus 2000 years ago). And Netanyahu is one of his agents, as I have shown here:
Others might believe otherwise, but we have to be coherent with the prophecies and the analysis of the facts, looking for the right side of this spiritual fight.
Related to this, it turns out that that prophecy regarding the canonization of Carlo Acutis is right: the youth would be anointed and prepared to be the leaders of what is to come. Charlie Kirk was assassinated three days after that event. Mélanie received a message that the prophecy was right, and that Charlie was working with Carlo to that end, guided both by our Holy Mother Mary. I wrote an article that Mélanie liked on this matter:
https://groups.google.com/g/sharing-era-of-peace/c/Q_jVGZQjQj0/m/Dum7bVfGAQAJ
The messages Mélanie received on this matter are right (and it is confirmed in a transversal way by a prophecy by María Esperanza, Venezuelan Messenger of God https://veilofveronica.blog/2025/09/17/the-sifting/). But guess what: that movement described above questioning the Trump administration on the matter of the death of Charlie Kirk, and blaming Israel, has united most of those youth, and many of them are contributing to the grassroot investigations. It has even united young Republicans and Democrats. You can just go to X to observe that (for example how they cheered at Indiana University, a place full of Democrats, when Tucker Carlson gave a talk within the Turning Point conference). This in spite of the double down of Israel making lots of propaganda in X against Candace and Tucker, and other independent thinkers.
My point is that it might even be possible that God is going to use Trump as a key player to bring good to humanity, and he is playing chess (with moves that do not reflect his final strategy). But we do not have to say that Trump is in control: it is not only not necessary; it is counterproductive.
By the way, Donald Trump would not be the commander of the forces of good after the Warning. We will have a human commander, under the guidance of our Holy Mother of Guadalupe (the one who stamps her foot to crush the head of the serpent), and the help of St. Michael and all the angels. And that commander is going to be the “Great Catholic Monarch,” a king for the whole world, prophesied from before (in particular by Marie-Julie Jahenny and La Salette), and even has a name: Henry V of the Cross, a French descendant of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. In this case, we can certainly say that he would be “in control.” Why? Because after the Warning, the warriors who are part of our Holy Mother Mary are sanctified, have become completely purified and their wills will be completely united to the Will of God: their freedom will be exercised to choose the roles God has for them to play.
They would not commit treason or deviate from the Will of God, from His Divine Providence, the plan to save humanity and conduct it to the Era of Peace, after defeating the bad forces, during the apocalyptic Great Tribulation. Even Trump, if he chooses the right side of the fight during the “reprieve” (the time of choice between God and Satan), can be “in control” (leading the good forces in the US, for example), but all the people who will be on the good side are also going to be in control. No need to single Trump out like that at this moment, for the reasons I said.
Regarding the ongoing assassination investigation into Charlie Kirk—which occurred in September 2025, with suspect Tyler Robinson arrested by the FBI on charges of aggravated murder, but the people think is a patsy—and the broader agenda of the Israeli government, it's noteworthy that pro-Israel billionaires, including Oracle's Larry Ellison, acquired TikTok's U.S. operations in a $14 billion deal facilitated by Congress to divest it from Chinese ownership under ByteDance. This maneuver has misled U.S. citizens by framing it solely as a national security issue while in practice enabling greater influence over content moderation. Pro-Israel groups are indeed investing heavily in propaganda across social networks and traditional media to shape narratives. Regarding X, the only remaining really free social media thanks to Elon Musk, there is growing evidence that X's algorithm has been altered to favor Zionism and suppress U.S. patriots; in fact, it often controls “antisemitic” and “conspiratorial” content that favors critics of that establishment.
The bad side clearly controls the FBI, CIA, and DOJ under Trump, and it is obvious it is all orchestrated by the Antichrist (we don’t need proof, again!). But even if this wrong side prevails temporarily, the good side will ultimately triumph after the Warning.
From the Marian prophecies outlined in The Plan of God for the Apocalyptic Times, we understand that the Warning will occur precisely before the detonation of the first nuclear bomb and the abandonment of the Eucharist amid the coming schism in the Church. It is now also evident that the global triumph of false narratives—including the suppression of the release of the Epstein files and the assassination of Charlie Kirk—will serve as additional triggers for the Warning.
In this scenario, the devil would have amassed excessive power over humanity, rendering even figures like Trump (assuming his alignment with the good side) unable to alter the trajectory toward potential extermination. Only direct divine intervention can thwart the devil's complete dominion over the world.
Thus, the idea is not to dwell excessively on these negative developments, but to be careful to be objective about the analysis regarding them. It is with the right perspective about the “waves” that we can center ourselves in God’s providence for these times, which are remarkably good and merciful—despite the necessary general purification through the Great Tribulation that precedes the Era of Peace. This Era is the one which will feature the full and renewal of leadership by youth worldwide, as foretold in the prophecies attributed to Blessed Carlo Acutis and echoed in Charlie Kirk's vision for a faith-driven future.
In summary, I believe the message "Trump is in control"—one of those received by Mélanie—does not originate from Heaven. It is wrong to blame those who distrust him or raise legitimate concerns, especially when conducting an objective analysis. Doing "prayer" for them is an implicit accusation that is misguided, as it often masks underlying judgment and condemnation, fostering unnecessary division among the faithful and even alienating elements of the Charlie Kirk and Carlo Acutis youth movement. At its root, this stems from a falsehood, since God alone is in control. We can hope Trump aligns with God's will, but we must still critique his deviations as we perceive them—no issue there. Let us instead pray and fast for God's will to be done swiftly and effectively. It will be done, of course, but our active contributions through discernment and unity can hasten that outcome. This is where our efforts should be focused. It is a fact that God does not depend on Trump or any given human being (including the Pope himself). To insinuate the contrary is a gross form of idolatry and a clear fault to the first commandment. My conclusion is that a message of this kind cannot come from heaven.
4. About the other prophets.
I was told by Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan in the letter in which our relationship was cut:
“You are focusing on the waves rather than remaining in the triumphant Ark of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Through the messages received from the Triumph of the Two Most Holy Hearts, the Lord had asked us to transmit only Peace, Hope, Joy, Blessing, and to find our true Refuge in the triumphant Heart of Mary, which is both a spiritual and physical Refuge.
“The Lord had also warned you not to remain in two boats at the same time: that of fear, discouragement, anxiety, and inner turmoil, but rather to enter the one that bears the good fruits of Trust and Peace. You have chosen your boat, and we regret your choice.”
I want to inform you of the context for these statements. By “focusing on the waves” they mean the storms to come, rather than the boat to save yourself from them. And being in the wrong boat means to be in the boat that leads to perdition, instead of salvation. I would do this following the wrong prophets. For example, Fr. Michel Rodrigue and Luz de María de Bonilla. They are stating this mainly because I said in the original email message:
“...heaven is also telling Mélanie that there are going to be a couple of weeks in which debit and credit cards will not work. The banking system is going to be paralyzed, and through that channel, the electronic payment system. Therefore, we need to stock up on cash.
“It’s interesting, but many other Marian prophecies have warned about it.”
Mélanie and the team did not like that I mentioned other Marian prophets. On this, Mélanie has criticized in private Luz de María de Bonilla because presumably her messages have led to 100 suicides. The alleged reason is because people who read them become fearful (they “focus on the waves”). I used to trust Mélanie on that, and I erased all my articles about Luz de María, around 100 in all, in my blog:
https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/P%C3%A1gina_principal
Mélanie even said that, while reading one of the messages given by St. Michael to Luz de María, St. Michael the Archangel appeared to her to say that the message did not come from him. According to Mélanie, it comes from a deity (a devil), Yahweh.
It turns out that, according to a message given by Padre Pio to Mélanie (June 11, 2024), several names of God in the Bible are not legitimate names of God. They are deities also, demons. The alleged message from Padre Pio says:
“Several deities also feed on this: Yahweh, Elohim, Sabaoth, Jehovah, Sanishslov, Iraguay. Elohim is the main one who fed on souls killed in war.”
But several of those names appear in the Bible, again, as names of God. When I was told this, I was hugely surprised. But in my naivete, I believed it at the time. And I did as I said: erased all the messages from Luz de María. And I did not continue to read or send her messages to my contacts. In fact, I was also supposed to defend Mélanie against a person in Canada, Yves Jacques, who said that Mélanie needed to find a confessor and a spiritual guide, since those things were wrong.
I was thinking for a long time on how to do it, and even devised a way to proceed. But now I began to doubt it and looked at the Catechism. It turns out that the names Yahweh, Elohim, Sabaoth are legitimate. Yahweh is a legitimate translation of YHWH, with imprimatur by the Church; Jehovah is the translation in the Protestant Bibles. It means “I am who I am,” the main name of God, revealed to Moses. The other names of God mentioned allegedly by Padre Pio to Mélanie are Elohim, Sabaoth, which can be found easily in the Bible and in the CCC. Not only in the Old Testament, but also in the New Testament. For example, "Sabaoth" (from Hebrew "Tzevaot," meaning "armies" or "hosts") refers to God as commander of heavenly armies, symbolizing power and judgment. It appears in Romans 9:29, a quote from Isaiah 1:9. In James 5:4, in Amos 5:16.
In my search, I found something in the Catechism that relates private to public revelation: CCC 66:
"The Christian economy, therefore, since it is the new and definitive Covenant, will never pass away; and no new public revelation is to be expected before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ." Yet even if Revelation is already complete, it has not been made completely explicit; it remains for Christian faith gradually to grasp its full significance over the course of the centuries.
CCC 67:
Throughout the ages, there have been so-called "private" revelations, some of which have been recognized by the authority of the Church. They do not belong, however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to improve or complete Christ's definitive Revelation, but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the Magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church. Christian faith cannot accept "revelations" that claim to surpass or correct the Revelation of which Christ is the fulfillment, as is the case in certain non-Christian religions and also in certain recent sects which base themselves on such "revelations."
The point to notice is that public revelation ended with Christ and the Apostles, while private revelations (e.g., apparitions like Fatima or Lourdes, Mélanie, etc.) can be authentic but must align with public revelation and are subject to Church discernment (CCC 93).
I conclude that it cannot be a message from heaven that Yahweh, and the other legitimate names, is a deity, a devil. It is a valid name of God. It is true that the public revelation is a process of learning, and at the end, the best name for God is Abba Father, as Mélanie emphasizes. But to claim the first names are not legitimate is invalid according to our Church, which we must obey. In fact, to say that Yahweh, for example, is a demon, is a blasphemy. A grave sin. It is the sin directly opposite to the virtue of practicing the second Commandment, to sanctify the Name of God (CCC 2148). How is Padre Pio going to commit blasphemy, being in heaven? The conclusion is now clear to me: Padre Pio did not send that message to Mélanie. It comes from another source. Most probably the devil, given that he is the prince of lies and division.
5. Details about Fr. Michel and Luz de María
Fr. Michel and Luz de María are the most relevant prophets of God for these Apocalyptic times, as far as I can tell. But Mélanie’s disqualifications center on them. Regarding Fr. Michel, Mélanie has said to us that 25% of his messages do not come from Heaven. I have been worried about that since then, because I have defended him a couple of times against “experts” (I have the references, if needed). I have offered her a way to contact him and clarify matters, but she dismissed that offer, claiming that she received a message from heaven that “Fr. Michel is coming to us,” which, in light of Matthew 18:15-17, is not correct.
In addition, I think she is applying the “Ad hominem” fallacy on him. When you discuss an argument with someone, you should address the content of the argument, the message, if you disagree with it. It is not allowed to disqualify the person making the argument (the messenger) in order to disqualify the message. Jesus Himself warned us against that in Matthew 23:2-3: even the Pharisees might be right in what they say. In that case we should follow what they say, even though we should not follow them, who act contrary to what they preach.
Trying to find the reason behind Mélanie's message against Fr. Michel, I have asked her several times about what is wrong about God’s Plan for Apocalyptic Times, which I wrote based on his teachings and in the Revelations book (by Xavier Reyes-Ayral):
https://www.quehacer.wiki/wiki/God%27s_Plan_for_Apocalyptic_Times
Last time I insisted, she did not respond to the question, but said instead that she was going to pray for me and for Fr. Michel. In the given context, that can only mean that we are wrong and need correction. Heaven would bring the needed change in us. But the fact of the matter is that Mélanie has failed to provide the reason why Fr. Michel is 25% wrong in his messages, incurring in the fallacy, which is basically a way to lie. Lies come from the devil, not from heaven.
When I said in my email that other Marian prophecies said the same as Mélanie regarding the need to prepare for a financial blackout, I was thinking about what Fr. Michel has said, including the warning that the Antichrist is going to use the financial system to implement the “mark of the beast.” I said to them after the incident: It was not Luz de María, against whom Mélanie has something much worse than against Fr. Michel, as I said. At this moment I can say that what Daniel, Stephan, and Mélanie said to me does not make sense, since they considered that change after the financial reset to be something good for us, when we have been expecting that the main change would be to implement the Central Bank Digital Currency, which would be part of the scheme of the Mark of the Beast. At this point I know that the banking reset would not bring something good for us, contrary to what they have said. The financial sector is the main structure of the Deep State, led by the Antichrist, as far as I know by the evidence. Why would something good for us come from them?
Again, regarding Luz de María: Since I began to doubt the version of Mélanie regarding her, I checked again on her messages. And found that when she mentions cataclysms, she always asks us to pray. And gives the solution: to trust God, with His several spiritual and physical solutions (like prepare with food). Those natural cataclysmic things are given as warnings. The point is that Luz de María has not centered only on the waves (the storms), but also on the boat provided by God to face them. In fact, Mélanie also has recommended physical measures, not only spiritual ones. For example having cash for the coming shortage of banking services. Luz de María cannot be criticized for recommending physical preparations. Fr. Michel too: he has recommended three months of food and water.
Mélanie has said several times that God does not want her to look at other prophets' messages. Even if it is a temptation, she should not read the messages of Luz de María and Fr. Michel. Even if she reads them, she should not criticize them behind their backs. Especially if it is done in their backs. To follow the recommendations of Jesus (Mt 18:15-17), she should give them a chance to explain themselves. I have offered her a contact to talk to Fr. Michel, but she responded, following a message she received: “he will come to us, not us to him.” This is not right, as I now realize fully. That message does not come from God, since it contradicts Mt 18:15-17.
I still believe that she can correct the course: apologize to those prophets. And to correct the message of Padre Pio regarding the names of God.
If she does not do this, she will greatly hurt the mission: a private messenger cannot criticize other private messengers this way without the right to respond. We should strive for unity and truth, not division and lies. And of course, a private messenger cannot criticize our public revelation: the Bible, the Catechism. If that is known by the authorities, the whole mission will be disqualified. Even if some messages, like the chaplets (in which I believe) are legitimate and good for us. Now recall again that they told me:
“The Lord had also warned you not to remain in two boats at the same time: that of fear, discouragement, anxiety, and inner turmoil, but rather to enter the one that bears the good fruits of Trust and Peace. You have chosen your boat, and we regret your choice.”
You, Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan, are judging me: I am at fault according to that statement. Even if it was true, you don’t focus on my arguments: what is wrong with them. Which is not a Christian thing to do (since we should not judge anybody: only God has that privilege). Not even an atheist thing to do, since it is a fallacy, as I have explained (the fallacy ad hominem). It is true that you have arguments in favor of your position, in order to counteract my original email message. But those are based not on reasoning, but on messages received by Mélanie. That is another fallacy in a rational discussion: argumentum ad verecundiam, or “Appeal to authority: (Insisting that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true, without any other supporting evidence offered).”
Of course we can decide the validity of an argument on the basis of faith. But it is a spiritual argument, it cannot contradict the authority of the Catholic Church, in particular to the direct teachings of Jesus. I have demonstrated here, as far as I can tell, that Mélanie's authority, regarding those specific arguments treated here, is lacking. Those messages are false: they cannot come from Heaven, because they contradict the laws of democracy, and the respect due to our Catholic Church.
Here with that statement “You have chosen your boat (the wrong one),” you are implying that I chose the side of the devil. Because in these times there are only two sides, as we have said regarding the book of Revelations. It is not only a disqualification, but a condemnation. It is an ad hominem attack, which is not even allowed in the atheistic theory of the discourse (fallacy). But is it Christian behavior? It is contrary to God’s rules of behavior, since it implies usurping the majesty of God, nothing less, directly contradicting the commandment of God of not judging (let alone condemning) anybody (Luke 6:37).
But there is an additional fault, as if that were not enough. According to Mt 18:15-17, “If your brother (me) does something wrong, etc.” But you should talk to me in private. You did not admit my arguments to explain myself, but rushed to a stark decision demanding immediate and blind obedience, as I have explained. That would not be completely wrong. But the next step in Mt 18:15-17 is to talk about the issue with other witnesses. Not only you did not do that. But you talked to some of the people in the groups about my “wrongs” without me being present: on my back. How is that acceptable?
6. Conclusion and recommendation
For all that has been said in this document, I am applying to Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan the procedure Jesus instructs us for these kinds of cases: you did something wrong. I talked to you in private, but you misbehaved again. And now I am in the second step, which is with the members of the groups being present (the community, since you went directly to them at my back). Please respond, with them being present, as witnesses. If there is no satisfaction in the respective arguments, I will go to the last step: “if he refuses to listen to the community, treat him like a gentile or a tax collector.” In other words, I will go public on this. The reason is not scandal: it is to defend our Church from grave deviations, as presented here.
It is to notice that “focusing on love and trust, peace, hope, joy, blessings” does not imply focusing only on Mélanie as a messenger. God has many prophets and pretending otherwise is a grave lack of respect for His Majesty, His Omnipotence, and His Providence. I have had the impression, all along (and I can provide the receipts), that Mélanie, Daniel, and Stephan find equivalence of the good focus on the focus on her and her mission. Not focusing on God and all his messages and messengers, private and public. That, if true, would be absolutely preposterous. And completely wrong. I have not found a doctrinal error in Fr. Michel or Luz de María. And their emphasis is also in love and trust. Why don't we strive for unity and complementation, instead of other motivations, probably rivalry and/or exclusivity? Why don’t we strive on focusing on God, and his many ways and people to guide us within the Church and its doctrine and tradition, instead of only on a given messenger, even if that one messenger talks only about love and trust? That would be a trap of the devil, of course. We don't want that.
That is one of the reasons to include Xavier Ayral in this talk: I am sure Fr. Michel and Luz de María would be willing to talk to Mélanie and look for a solution. Let us look for unity and truth, instead of division, fallacies, lack of transparency, and gossiping. Let us leave behind the errors and correct the direction in our boats, looking at the same compass, that of the rules and teaching of our Church, looking for one and a single path: that of Jesus.
Everyone would come out in great benefit. In fact, we would defeat the devil, the culprit of this snare, with unity, love, and truth: we would be even better off than before, so God would use this to improve our standing in our respective calls by Him. Is that possible? Of course it is! Talking to Fr. Michel, a priest in good standing, besides being a true messenger of God, would be, in my humble opinion, the first fundamental step for an overall solution, which will produce a unity and mutual support among all the groups of all these wonderful missions, led by the respective Messengers of God. I am sure Xavier would be willing to facilitate that contact. Forgetting and forgiving previous problems and misunderstandings, for the sake of God and His Plan for these Apocalyptic times.
Best regards and blessings, in union of prayers in the Light of Jesus Christ,
Felipe
Annex: About Talking on Your Back:
Even if this document is already long, it is worthwhile to include here in an insert, the teachings of the Catechism (CCC) against talking about others behind their backs (in this case me, Fr. Michel, and Luz de María de Bonilla):
Gossip and speaking ill of others behind their back (known as "detraction" or "calumny" in Catholic teaching) are addressed under the Eighth Commandment ("You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor") in Part Three, Section Two, Chapter Two, Article 8: "The Eighth Commandment" (CCC 2475-2487). These sins violate truth, charity, and justice by harming reputation without objective necessity. Here are the key paragraphs (exact text from the official English translation):
CCC 2477
Respect for the reputation of persons forbids every attitude and word likely to cause them unjust injury. He becomes guilty: of rash judgment who, even tacitly, assumes as true, without sufficient foundation, the moral fault of a neighbor; of detraction who, without objectively valid reason, discloses another's faults and failings to persons who did not know them; of calumny who, by remarks contrary to the truth, harms the reputation of others and gives occasion for false judgments concerning them.
CCC 2478
To avoid rash judgment, everyone should be careful to interpret insofar as possible his neighbor's thoughts, words, and deeds in a favorable way:
"Every good Christian ought to be more ready to give a favorable interpretation to another's statement than to condemn it. But if he cannot do so, let him ask how the other understands it. And if the latter understands it badly, let the former correct him with love. If that does not suffice, let the Christian try all suitable ways to bring the other to a correct interpretation so that he may be saved."
CCC 2479
Detraction and calumny destroy the reputation and honor of one's neighbor. Honor is the social witness given to human dignity, and everyone enjoys a natural right to the honor of his name and reputation and to respect. Thus, detraction and calumny offend against the virtues of justice and charity.
CCC 2487
Every offense committed against justice and truth entails the duty of reparation, even if its author has been forgiven. When it is impossible publicly to make reparation for a wrong, it must be made secretly. If one who has suffered harm cannot be directly compensated, he must be given moral satisfaction in the name of charity. This duty of reparation also concerns offenses against another's reputation. This reparation, moral and sometimes material, must be evaluated in terms of the extent of the damage inflicted. It obliges in conscience.
In conclusion for this annex:
These paragraphs teach that gossip (detraction: revealing true faults without need) or slander (calumny: spreading falsehoods) behind someone's back is a grave sin against charity (love of neighbor) and justice (CCC 1807). It harms dignity (CCC 1700) and can lead to division. The Church encourages correction with love (as in Matthew 18:15-17) and reparation if harm is done (e.g., apologizing privately or publicly).
