Conspiracy and fraud in the US elections - Historial de revisiones

Felipeperezmarti: /* Summary */

2021-05-26T02:08:23Z

Summary

Felipeperezmarti: /* Summary */

2021-05-26T02:06:42Z

Summary

Felipeperezmarti: /* 7. Sidney Powell and Michael Lindell are not liars but heroes. */

2021-05-16T03:39:47Z

7. Sidney Powell and Michael Lindell are not liars but heroes.

Felipeperezmarti: /* 7. Summary of the political trial, caveats and the importance of it. */

2021-04-25T00:35:08Z

7. Summary of the political trial, caveats and the importance of it.

Felipeperezmarti: /* 6. Sidney Powell and Michael Lindell are not liars but heroes. */

2021-04-25T00:34:48Z

6. Sidney Powell and Michael Lindell are not liars but heroes.

Felipeperezmarti: /* 5. The case of Donald Trump: is he bluffing regarding the claim of fraud? */

2021-04-25T00:34:30Z

5. The case of Donald Trump: is he bluffing regarding the claim of fraud?

Felipeperezmarti: /* 4. The case of China: is it guilty of conspiracy and fraud in the US elections? */

2021-04-25T00:34:11Z

4. The case of China: is it guilty of conspiracy and fraud in the US elections?

Felipeperezmarti: /* 3. The signals confirm that Biden is guilty and Trump is innocent. Trump is the legitimate President. */

2021-04-25T00:33:47Z

3. The signals confirm that Biden is guilty and Trump is innocent. Trump is the legitimate President.

Felipeperezmarti: /* 2. The Principal, the people; the Agents, the politicians. Is the legal system in the US failing the people? */

2021-04-25T00:33:04Z

2. The Principal, the people; the Agents, the politicians. Is the legal system in the US failing the people?

Felipeperezmarti: /* 2. The Principal, the people; the Agents, the politicians. Is the legal system in the US failing the people? */

2021-04-25T00:14:13Z

2. The Principal, the people; the Agents, the politicians. Is the legal system in the US failing the people?

@@ Línea 14: / Línea 14: @@
 <br />
-The purpose of this essay is to show that what Russ Ramsland said about the US approaching Venezuela is true; that it is not easy to stop that converging process; and what the alternatives are. I start by answering some key questions regarding the plausibility of the conspiracy theory and that of electoral fraud being committed. I then prove my claim of conspiracy and fraud using powerful economics tools that allow us to make inferences about unobserved variables (fraud, conspiracy) using observed variables (public performance by Joe Biden and Donald Trump). Then I address the issue of a change of system in the US: from a democratic republic, in which there is rule of law, to a rentistic country, a de facto regime with an international mafia cartel moving the threads of politics and public institutions. I stress the fact that in this new gen war and new gen dictatorial regimes, the cultural tools of mind control and manipulation of the  people  are the most determinant weapons. I finish with a proposal for all patriots: unite, fight at every battleground and convince the fooled democrats as if you are a seller, using the principle that “the customer is always right (and go around to convince him or the truth)”, doing boicot and substitution of the poisonous products in the political and economic markets.
+The purpose of this essay is to show that what Russ Ramsland said about the US approaching Venezuela is true; that it is not easy to stop that converging process; and what the alternatives are. I start by answering some key questions regarding the plausibility of the conspiracy theory and that of electoral fraud being committed. I then prove my claim of conspiracy and fraud using powerful economics tools that allow us to make inferences about unobserved variables (fraud, conspiracy) using observed variables (public performance by Joe Biden and Donald Trump). Then I address the issue of a change of system in the US: from a democratic republic, in which there is rule of law, to a rentistic country, a de facto regime with an international mafia cartel moving the threads of politics and public institutions. I stress the fact that in this new gen war and new gen dictatorial regimes, the cultural tools of mind control and manipulation of the  people  are the most determinant weapons. I finish with a proposal for all patriots: unite, fight at every battleground and convince the fooled democrats as if you are a seller, using the principle that “the customer is always right (and go around to convince him of the truth)”, while doing boicot and substitution of the poisonous products in the political and economic markets.
 == Is the conspiracy theory false? What is its real scope? ==

@@ Línea 14: / Línea 14: @@
 <br />
-The purpose of this essay is to show that what Russ Ramsland said about the US approaching Venezuela is true; that it is not easy to stop that converging process; and what the alternatives are. I start by answering some key questions regarding the plausibility of the conspiracy theory and that of electoral fraud being committed. I then prove my claim of conspiracy and fraud using powerful economics tools that allow us to make inferences about unobserved variables (fraud, conspiracy) using observed variables (public performance by Joe Biden and Donald Trump). Then I address the issue of a change of system in the US: from a democratic republic, in which there is rule of law, to a rentistic country, a de facto regime with an international mafia cartel moving the threads of politics and public institutions. I stress the fact that in this new gen war and new gen dictatorial regimes, the cultural tools of mind control and manipulation of the  people  are the most determinant weapons.
+The purpose of this essay is to show that what Russ Ramsland said about the US approaching Venezuela is true; that it is not easy to stop that converging process; and what the alternatives are. I start by answering some key questions regarding the plausibility of the conspiracy theory and that of electoral fraud being committed. I then prove my claim of conspiracy and fraud using powerful economics tools that allow us to make inferences about unobserved variables (fraud, conspiracy) using observed variables (public performance by Joe Biden and Donald Trump). Then I address the issue of a change of system in the US: from a democratic republic, in which there is rule of law, to a rentistic country, a de facto regime with an international mafia cartel moving the threads of politics and public institutions. I stress the fact that in this new gen war and new gen dictatorial regimes, the cultural tools of mind control and manipulation of the  people  are the most determinant weapons. I finish with a proposal for all patriots: unite, fight at every battleground and convince the fooled democrats as if you are a seller, using the principle that “the customer is always right (and go around to convince him or the truth)”, doing boicot and substitution of the poisonous products in the political and economic markets.
 == Is the conspiracy theory false? What is its real scope? ==

@@ Línea 132: / Línea 132: @@
 There has been a vicious attack performed by the MSM on Sidney Powell and Michael Lindell because of their actions in this regard. In particular Dominion has accused Ms. and Powell and Mr. Lindell  in court regarding alleged defamation. As the lawyers of Ms. Powell lawyers have stated in their legal language, she, as a citizen, has the right of free speech: the right to perform a personal political trial on politicians, public institutions, and the electoral system. In particular, Dominion. And she does not have the burden of proof, as I have demonstrated. They pretend to use, again, the fallacy of ignorance: since fraud by Dominion has not been proven to be true, it is false, and whoever says the contrary, is defaming them. Outrageous. Dominion is the one, as the electoral system and Joe Biden, who have to face the courts and prove that they are innocent, if the courts were doing their jobs. They have the burden of proof, not Sidney Powell.
-The phrase that represents the main argument of Sidney Powell's lawyers, used by the GMC to accuse Sidney Powell of a liar, is the following: “Reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process”.  It is inferred by our reasoning that it is false that this means that she is a liar. It should be clear the difference if she is the accused party or if she is the accuser. If loses being accused, the negative economic impact for her is huge. If she loses being the accuser, she only has minor costs in comparison, while Dominion has to pay the price of a huge crime. That could explain to some people the strategy of Ms. Powell's team in this legal process in which her lawyers issued that plea, based on simple principles of martial arts to avoid the blow of an enemy. But the greatest support for it comes from a question of democratic, ethical and fair principles. In that regard, the correct translation, given the correct interpretation framework that we have demonstrated, is as follows:
+The phrase that represents the main argument of Sidney Powell's lawyers, used by the MSM to accuse Sidney Powell of being a liar, is the following: “Reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process”.  By our reasoning it is false that this means she is a liar. It should be clear the difference between her being  the accused party from being the accuser one. If she loses being accused, the negative economic impact for her is huge. On the other hand, if she loses being the accuser, she only has minor costs in comparison, while Dominion has to pay the price of a huge crime. That should explain to some people the strategy of Ms. Powell's team in this legal process in which her lawyers issued that plea, based on simple principles of martial arts to dodge the blow of an enemy and use it against him. It is true in a sense, since the MSM took the bait and their lies are backfiring.  But the greatest support for it comes from a question of democratic, ethical and justice principles. In that regard, the correct translation, given the correct interpretation framework that we have demonstrated, is as follows:
 “Reasonable citizens would know that those statements are political opinions, to which Ms Powell has the right based on the freedom of speech principle. In order to be proven as facts they have to be brought to a court of law in which both sides of the conflict would have the opportunity to present their cases, so that the truth about them will come out. Ms Powell’s opinion is that they are true, and she would be defending that side in such a legal trial”.
@@ Línea 139: / Línea 140: @@
 This is what is called in game theory a “costly signal”, that we mentioned before, which separates her from the conspirators, the cheaters.
-The “separating equilibrium” in this signaling game demonstrates then that that Sidney Powell, and Michael Lindell are not not, as the MSM has tried to portray them, a liars, but  heroes. Heroes of the United States of America and its people. The MSM, if they served the people, should be applauding her courage, not attacking her. Another indication that the  MSM are traitors of the US citizens and their nation, since they have turned against their interests and serve the enemies of their republic. And they are acting as cowards too, since they are colluding to bully a couple of  citizens, including a woman. A clear indication that the rentistic system virus is taking hold of the US here: the powerful, without being right, trying to impose their will, acting as bullies, on the defenseless patriotic citizens, and discourage those who dare to confront them.
+The “separating equilibrium” in this signaling game demonstrates then that Sidney Powell, and Michael Lindell are not, as the MSM has tried to portray them, liars, but  heroes. Heroes of the United States of America and its people. The MSM, if they served the people, should be applauding her courage, not attacking her. Another indication that the  MSM are traitors of the US citizens and their nation, since they have turned against their interests and serve the enemies of their republic. And they are acting as cowards too, since they are colluding to bully a couple of  citizens, including a woman. A clear indication that the rentistic system virus is taking hold of the US here: the powerful, without being right, use all their power and influence to impose their will, acting as bullies, on the defenseless patriotic citizens, and discourage those who dare to confront them.
 === 8. Summary of the political trial, caveats and the importance of it. ===

@@ Línea 141: / Línea 141: @@
 The “separating equilibrium” in this signaling game demonstrates then that that Sidney Powell, and Michael Lindell are not not, as the MSM has tried to portray them, a liars, but  heroes. Heroes of the United States of America and its people. The MSM, if they served the people, should be applauding her courage, not attacking her. Another indication that the  MSM are traitors of the US citizens and their nation, since they have turned against their interests and serve the enemies of their republic. And they are acting as cowards too, since they are colluding to bully a couple of  citizens, including a woman. A clear indication that the rentistic system virus is taking hold of the US here: the powerful, without being right, trying to impose their will, acting as bullies, on the defenseless patriotic citizens, and discourage those who dare to confront them.
-=== 7. Summary of the political trial, caveats and the importance of it. ===
+=== 8. Summary of the political trial, caveats and the importance of it. ===
 <br />

@@ Línea 123: / Línea 123: @@
 Now, Trump, as a politician, is also subject to suspicion in a democracy using the same commented Caesar's wife principle, and might be confirmed guilty because his claim of fraud might be a bluff. But the fact that he was willing to present the evidence in court and to face the verdict, even if it would be against him, is in itself a “costly signal”, which clearly separates him from Biden.
-=== 6. Sidney Powell and Michael Lindell are not liars but heroes. ===
+=== 7. Sidney Powell and Michael Lindell are not liars but heroes. ===
 <br />
@@ Línea 139: / Línea 139: @@
 This is what is called in game theory a “costly signal”, that we mentioned before, which separates her from the conspirators, the cheaters.
 The “separating equilibrium” in this signaling game demonstrates then that that Sidney Powell, and Michael Lindell are not not, as the MSM has tried to portray them, a liars, but  heroes. Heroes of the United States of America and its people. The MSM, if they served the people, should be applauding her courage, not attacking her. Another indication that the  MSM are traitors of the US citizens and their nation, since they have turned against their interests and serve the enemies of their republic. And they are acting as cowards too, since they are colluding to bully a couple of  citizens, including a woman. A clear indication that the rentistic system virus is taking hold of the US here: the powerful, without being right, trying to impose their will, acting as bullies, on the defenseless patriotic citizens, and discourage those who dare to confront them.
 === 7. Summary of the political trial, caveats and the importance of it. ===

@@ Línea 117: / Línea 117: @@
 The same kind of arguments goes for the China involvement. On this matter, and taking into account the information given by Michael Lindell’s video, Biden’s supporters might claim that it is very difficult to detect the real IP address of a computer, since you might use a VPN to mask it. But the fact that the US patriotic hackers claim that they have detected all the other elements of the fraud, including the detailed amount of voters changed, and are willing to produce sworn affidavits on the matter, sets the case for the people to “open the political case” against that foreign country. In particular since it has huge incentives to be involved in this matter in that way: for them it is a matter of billions of dollars they save if Biden, and not Trump, is in charge. So, Joe Biden and his team have the burden on the  proof here too.
-=== 5. The case of Donald Trump: is he bluffing regarding the claim of fraud? ===
+=== 6. The case of Donald Trump: is he bluffing regarding the claim of fraud? ===
 <br />
 Now, Trump, as a politician, is also subject to suspicion in a democracy using the same commented Caesar's wife principle, and might be confirmed guilty because his claim of fraud might be a bluff. But the fact that he was willing to present the evidence in court and to face the verdict, even if it would be against him, is in itself a “costly signal”, which clearly separates him from Biden.
 === 6. Sidney Powell and Michael Lindell are not liars but heroes. ===

@@ Línea 111: / Línea 111: @@
 Notice that it is not so only in the minds of the republican people. Also in the minds of Biden grassroots followers when they realize the implications at hand. The simple claim that Joe Biden is innocent is what is called in those theories a ``cheap talk” signal, and what it does is the opposite to the intended purpose: it is taken in the political trial as a performance that confirms the initial guilty hypothesis. If the patriots are able to reach for the fooled democrats, an early end of the honeymoon with the grassroots democrats is to be expected given those signals by Joe Biden, on top of the many disappointments they have experienced already.
-=== 4. The case of China: is it guilty of conspiracy and fraud in the US elections? ===
+=== 5. The case of China: is it guilty of conspiracy and fraud in the US elections? ===
 <br />
 The same kind of arguments goes for the China involvement. On this matter, and taking into account the information given by Michael Lindell’s video, Biden’s supporters might claim that it is very difficult to detect the real IP address of a computer, since you might use a VPN to mask it. But the fact that the US patriotic hackers claim that they have detected all the other elements of the fraud, including the detailed amount of voters changed, and are willing to produce sworn affidavits on the matter, sets the case for the people to “open the political case” against that foreign country. In particular since it has huge incentives to be involved in this matter in that way: for them it is a matter of billions of dollars they save if Biden, and not Trump, is in charge. So, Joe Biden and his team have the burden on the  proof here too.
 === 5. The case of Donald Trump: is he bluffing regarding the claim of fraud? ===

@@ Línea 99: / Línea 99: @@
 What we have seen then, besides the bad political opinions about Joe Biden of an important part of the population, is that the justice system is not prepared to deal with situations like this to the extent of allowing an enemy of the people to use it in its favor and against the people. That is why the responsibility of the SCOTUS is crucial here, since this kind of situation, which is extraordinary, merits invoking the constitutional principle of “necessitas”.  This principle applies when an authority fails to perform its duty to a degree of subverting the peace guaranteed by the social contract supposed to be in place, and the people have the right of rebellion against it. So what we have described is a worrying signal that the democratic system in the US is failing, and it is not prepared to deal with out of the ordinary situations like this that put in peril the very nature of the democratic republic.
-=== 3. The signals confirm that Biden is guilty and Trump is innocent. Trump is the legitimate President. ===
+=== 4. The signals confirm that Biden is guilty and Trump is innocent. Trump is the legitimate President. ===
 <br />
@@ Línea 110: / Línea 110: @@
 Notice that it is not so only in the minds of the republican people. Also in the minds of Biden grassroots followers when they realize the implications at hand. The simple claim that Joe Biden is innocent is what is called in those theories a ``cheap talk” signal, and what it does is the opposite to the intended purpose: it is taken in the political trial as a performance that confirms the initial guilty hypothesis. If the patriots are able to reach for the fooled democrats, an early end of the honeymoon with the grassroots democrats is to be expected given those signals by Joe Biden, on top of the many disappointments they have experienced already.
 === 4. The case of China: is it guilty of conspiracy and fraud in the US elections? ===

@@ Línea 65: / Línea 65: @@
-=== 2. The Principal, the people; the Agents, the politicians. Is the legal system in the US failing the people? ===
+=== 2. The Principal, the people; the Agents, the politicians. ===
 <br />
@@ Línea 78: / Línea 78: @@
 In strictly logical terms, the fallacy of ignorance is always false. If something has not been proven true, it is not necessarily false. It might be that the proof has not appeared yet. But in science and in a trial, be it in court or from the people, the argument is false, but up to a requirement related to who has the burden of proof. The social and scientific convention is that, for the null hypothesis, it is true unless it is proven false. In the case of a court trial, a citizen is innocent unless proven guilty, since the accuser has the burden of proof. What we have shown is that for a politician, he is corrupt unless he proves, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he is innocent. In this election case, there was fraud unless the Biden camp proves, beyond reasonable doubt, that there was not. The reason is that Biden has the burden of proof, as we have demonstrated.
@@ Línea 84: / Línea 87: @@
 In fact, the political election is like the election of a CEO  in a company. The electoral system is like a committee named to count the votes of the shareholders. If there is suspicion of fraud among the owners, not only the suspect candidate for agent is involved. The electoral system is too, since for some motive it might favor one of the candidates against the other.
-In this sense, It is to notice that the legal system should itself be thought of as representing the interests of the people, if there is democracy, since the people are the owners, the shareholders here, and want justice to prevail, and the courts are supposed to pursue and to and to be equipped to guarantee that for them. Once elections have occurred, they have the obligation, in the new case, to take a look if the electoral committee failed to reflect the will of the  owners.
+In this sense, It is to notice that the whole justice system should itself be thought of as representing the interests of the people, if there is democracy, since the people are the owners, the shareholders here, and want justice to prevail, and the courts are supposed to pursue and to and to be equipped to guarantee that for them. Once elections have occurred, they have the obligation, in the new case, to take a look if the electoral committee failed to reflect the will of the  owners.
 With this framework in mind we can now address the issues of technical procedures and the admission of evidence mentioned before. When there is a conflict between two players in court, it is natural for the defendant to avoid incriminating evidence to be admitted in the trial, and to go to extremes to detect procedural failures in the accuser in order to dismiss the case. The accuser, on the  other hand,  would push for evidence to be admitted, and to avoid procedural errors.
-But if we think carefully, the accuser being the party that has the burden of proof, is Biden himself and the electoral system, in probable collusion with him too. It is completely odd from the economic, political and justice points of view, that they are the parties involved in avoiding the evidence to be admitted for the trial, and to put obstacles regarding procedures. Like an applicant for a job, Biden has to face every single possible stain in his curriculum that comes out before the employers, since he wants to clear his name. His enemy is the presumption, even the suspicion, of guilt, in the minds of the people, his alter self who is under suspicion, like in the case of a job applicant.
+But if we think carefully, the accuser being the party that has the burden of proof, is Biden himself and the electoral system, in probable collusion with him too. It is completely odd from the economic, political and justice points of view, that they are the parties involved in avoiding the evidence to be admitted for the trial, and to put obstacles regarding procedures. Like an applicant for a job, Biden has to face every single possible stain in his curriculum that comes out before the employers, since he wants to clear his name. His enemy is the presumption, even the suspicion, of guilt, in the minds of the people; his alter self who is under suspicion, like in the case of a job applicant.
-The parties representing the people should be the DOJ, FBI and CIA too, since matters of international intelligence are involved. And the court themselves, since the electoral system is also under suspicion. If Joe Biden, DOJ, FBI, CIA, and the courts are avoiding the evidence, placing procedural obstacles, and avoiding opening the case, they are placing themselves directly against the people: as their enemy, and the usurper of their power. Like a job applicant who, instead of attempting to clear the minds of the employers from doubts and suspicion, hires himself against their  will. This indicates, by the way, that he has support inside the firm against the owners, since this is not a transaction based on the will of thee traders, but on the brute force of one of them.  In our case, the support comes from the conspirators described above.
+The parties representing the people should be the DOJ, FBI and CIA too, since matters of international intelligence are involved. And the court themselves, since the electoral system is also under suspicion. If Joe Biden, DOJ, FBI, CIA, and the courts are avoiding the evidence, placing procedural obstacles, and avoiding opening the case, they are placing themselves directly against the people: as their enemy, and the usurper of their power. Like a job applicant who, instead of attempting to clear the minds of the employers from doubts and suspicion, hires himself against their  will. This indicates, by the way, that he has support inside the firm against the owners, since this is not a transaction based on the will of the traders, but on the brute force of one of them.  In our case, the support comes from the conspirators described above.
 On top of this, the fact that the Joe Biden camp insists that the issue is who is better, Biden or Trump, and not if there was fraud or not, is an additional indication  that they do not want to face the people and try to win in their favor, and that tactic is a diversion tactic in this war, which is now clearly seen as a de facto fight, instead of a de jury one.
-What we have seen then, besides the bad political opinions about Joe Biden of an important part of the population, is that the legal system is not prepared to deal with situations like this to the extent to allow an enemy of the people to use it in its favor and against the people. That is why the responsibility of the SCOTUS is crucial here, since this kind of situation, which is extraordinary, merits invoking the constitutional principle of “necessitas”.  This is a worrying signal that the democratic system in the US is failing, and it is not prepared to deal with out of the ordinary situations like this that put in peril the very nature of the democratic republic.
+What we have seen then, besides the bad political opinions about Joe Biden of an important part of the population, is that the justice system is not prepared to deal with situations like this to the extent of allowing an enemy of the people to use it in its favor and against the people. That is why the responsibility of the SCOTUS is crucial here, since this kind of situation, which is extraordinary, merits invoking the constitutional principle of “necessitas”.  This principle applies when an authority fails to perform its duty to a degree of subverting the peace guaranteed by the social contract supposed to be in place, and the people have the right of rebellion against it. So what we have described is a worrying signal that the democratic system in the US is failing, and it is not prepared to deal with out of the ordinary situations like this that put in peril the very nature of the democratic republic.
 === 3. The signals confirm that Biden is guilty and Trump is innocent. Trump is the legitimate President. ===